Issues: Vax Specific

Anthrax

Hepatitis B

Hib 

HPV 

Influenza

Lyme Disease
Meningococcal

MMR    

Pneumococcal    

Polio

Rotavirus

● Smallpox

Tdap/Td

Varicella

Yellow Fever

 

Issues: Misc

Exemptions

Legislation 

New Vax Status

Religion

Thimerosal

 

Vaccine Info

2014 Schedule

ACIP Recs

Components
IOM Reports

● Vax Injury Comp Program
Manufacturer Links

Package Inserts

Reporting AEs

Thimerosal Table

VAERS

VISs

 

Links
 

Search
 

About IVS

Faculty Biographies

Publications

Donations

 

Email IVS

 

Disclaimers & Privacy
 

 

Institute for Vaccine Safety

Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health

615 N. Wolfe Street

Room W5041

Baltimore, MD 21205

www.vaccinesafety.edu

 

Religion and Vaccines

The practices and beliefs of various religious groups can seemingly be in conflict with some of the components of some vaccines. The information below touches on some of these topics and provides links to articles/webpages expanding on these issues.


Porcine-derived components
Some vaccines contain components with porcine origins. Religions that oppose the use of pork products may have objections. Information and links addressing these concerns are below.
  Muslims:

·    “The Gelatin formed as a result of the transformation of the bones, skin and tendons of a judicially impure animal is pure, and it is judicially permissible to eat it.” 1995 decision by the Islamic Organization for Medical Sciences in English and Arabic [link to complete text]

  Jews:

·    Drugs of Porcine origin are derived from the Pancreas which, as extracted, is not edible in the food sense  [link to complete text - see page 17] 

·    Excipients (non-active ingredients in vaccines) [link to complete text - see page 20]

    Gelatin: if no alternative is available, consumption of gelatin is permitted because it is being consumed in a non-edible form
Lactose: this is also an inedible form


Aborted Fetuses
Two cell lines currently used in vaccines are derived from selective abortions performed overseas in the 1960s; WI-38 from Germany in 1961 and MRC-5 from UK in 1966.  Many excellent and thoughtful papers have been written on the ethics and religious aspects arising from use of these human cell lines (see links below).

  Catholics:

·    “...as regards the vaccines [containing WI-38 or MRC-5] without an alternative, the need to contest so that others may be prepared must be reaffirmed, as should be the lawfulness of using the former in the meantime insomuch as is necessary in order to avoid a serious risk not only for one's own children but also, and perhaps more specifically, for the health conditions of the population as a whole - especially for pregnant women."  2005 Official Document, Moral Reflections on Vaccines Derived from Aborted Human Foetuses  [link to complete text]

·    “danger to the health of children could permit parents to use a vaccine which was developed using cell lines of illicit origin, while keeping in mind that everyone has the duty to make known their disagreement and to ask that their healthcare system make other types of vaccines available.”  2008 Instruction Dignitas Personae on Certain Bioethical Questions [link to complete text - near the end of section 35]

  Christians:

·    “Using technology developed from tissue of an intentionally aborted fetus, but without continuing the cell line from that fetus, may be morally acceptable.”  Immunization, Christian Medical & Dental Associations 2004.  [link to complete text]



Links to Relevant Articles
  • Christian Medical & Dental Associations. Immunization and Potential for Moral Complicity with Evil.  2004 [link]

  • Furton EJ.  Vaccines Originating in Abortion.  Ethics & Medics 1999;24(3):3-4. [link]

  • Grabenstein JD. Moral considerations with certain viral vaccines. Christ Pharm 1999;2(2): 3–6. [link]

  • Grabenstein JD.  What the world's religions teach, applied to vaccines and immune globulins.  Vaccine 2013;31(16):2011-23. [abstract | article (may require password)

  • Grabenstein JD. Where Medicine and Religion Intersect. Ann Pharmacother 2003;37:1338-9. [link]

  • Mynors G, Ghalamkari H, Beaumont S, Powell S, McGee P. Drugs of porcine origin and their clinical alternatives: an introductory guide 2004. National Prescribing Centre. [link]

  • NNii. Human Fetal Links with Some Vaccines. 2008. [link]

  • Pacholczyk T. The Morality of Vaccinating Our Children. 2005. National Catholic Bioethical Center. [link]

  • Rudd G. Is Vaccination Complicit with Abortion? Ann Pharmacother 2003;37:1340-1. [link]

  • Wikipedia. Vaccination and Religion. [link]

  • Zimmerman RK. Ethical analyses of vaccines grown in human cell strains derived from abortion: arguments and Internet search.  Vaccine 2004;22(31-32):4238-44. [abstract | article (may require password)]



This page was last updated on February 12, 2014

© 2014 Institute for Vaccine Safety